Ed (Joshi et al. 2014). Specific surgical procedures such as voluntary male circumcision have been performed safely by nonsurgeons (Ford et al. 2012). Task shifting can also help reduce healthcare costs. A recent review of economic evaluations suggested that task shifting in low-income countries may increase the number of services provided at a given quality and cost (Fulton et al. 2011). Task shifting within a neonatal unit PNB-0408 web caring for highly vulnerable patients may, however, pose particular challenges even though the WHO suggests this solution (WHO 2012) and the Essential Care of Small Babies (ECSB) training programme incorporates task shifting of basic skills such as nasogastric feeding to mothers where plausible (Moxon et al. 2015). Task-shifting programmes have, however, been criticised for being conducted in a vertical manner with insufficient attention to the complexities of health systems leading to ineffective provision of services and concerns about long-term sustainability (Lehmann et al. 2009). In addition, health professionals, including those represented by the World Health Professions Alliance (WHPA) have expressed strong concerns about the manner in which task shifting is implemented and potential implications for health workers (WHPA 2008). It is therefore important to understand how task shifting affects not only the patients but also the health workers and health systems in which they operate.Studies of task-shifting interventions to date have focused primarily on quantitative evaluations of patient outcomes and proficiency of new cadres of health workers. Less is known about the broader effects of task shifting, including the experiences of professional and lay health workers implicated in delegation of tasks (Colvin et al. 2013, Yaya Bocoum et al. 2013). A Cochrane qualitative literature review published in 2013 examined implications of task shifting for lay health workers (Glenton et al. 2013), but no systematic review of qualitative studies examining existing health workers’ experiences with task shifting in subSaharan Africa has been published to date.AimsThe overall aim of this qualitative literature review is to contribute to the understanding of how task-shifting interventions operate in the resource-limited settings most commonly found in sub-Saharan Africa. We want to understand the possible intended and unintended outcomes of task-shifting interventions for the various stakeholders involved. Specifically, this review seeks to answer the following:??How have task-shifting interventions in sub-Saharan Africa influenced existing health workers’ sense of agency and ability to provide care? Based on the literature review what recommendations can be made for task shifting as a potential intervention in Nairobi’s neonatal nurseries, in addition to the general, global guidelines provided by the WHO and the WHPA?MethodsDesignWe planned a priori to present findings in a narrative format, rather than summarised as quantitative data in keeping with our overall aims. Our literature search criteria were kept relatively broad, but only studies from subSaharan Africa were considered to capture experiences from resource-limited settings similar to the future task-shifting MK-886MedChemExpress L 663536 project environment in Kenya. PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for terms: `task shifting’; `task sharing’; `task delegation’; `task substitution’ or `delegation of work’ in all countries of sub-Saharan Africa, with additional parameters set.Ed (Joshi et al. 2014). Specific surgical procedures such as voluntary male circumcision have been performed safely by nonsurgeons (Ford et al. 2012). Task shifting can also help reduce healthcare costs. A recent review of economic evaluations suggested that task shifting in low-income countries may increase the number of services provided at a given quality and cost (Fulton et al. 2011). Task shifting within a neonatal unit caring for highly vulnerable patients may, however, pose particular challenges even though the WHO suggests this solution (WHO 2012) and the Essential Care of Small Babies (ECSB) training programme incorporates task shifting of basic skills such as nasogastric feeding to mothers where plausible (Moxon et al. 2015). Task-shifting programmes have, however, been criticised for being conducted in a vertical manner with insufficient attention to the complexities of health systems leading to ineffective provision of services and concerns about long-term sustainability (Lehmann et al. 2009). In addition, health professionals, including those represented by the World Health Professions Alliance (WHPA) have expressed strong concerns about the manner in which task shifting is implemented and potential implications for health workers (WHPA 2008). It is therefore important to understand how task shifting affects not only the patients but also the health workers and health systems in which they operate.Studies of task-shifting interventions to date have focused primarily on quantitative evaluations of patient outcomes and proficiency of new cadres of health workers. Less is known about the broader effects of task shifting, including the experiences of professional and lay health workers implicated in delegation of tasks (Colvin et al. 2013, Yaya Bocoum et al. 2013). A Cochrane qualitative literature review published in 2013 examined implications of task shifting for lay health workers (Glenton et al. 2013), but no systematic review of qualitative studies examining existing health workers’ experiences with task shifting in subSaharan Africa has been published to date.AimsThe overall aim of this qualitative literature review is to contribute to the understanding of how task-shifting interventions operate in the resource-limited settings most commonly found in sub-Saharan Africa. We want to understand the possible intended and unintended outcomes of task-shifting interventions for the various stakeholders involved. Specifically, this review seeks to answer the following:??How have task-shifting interventions in sub-Saharan Africa influenced existing health workers’ sense of agency and ability to provide care? Based on the literature review what recommendations can be made for task shifting as a potential intervention in Nairobi’s neonatal nurseries, in addition to the general, global guidelines provided by the WHO and the WHPA?MethodsDesignWe planned a priori to present findings in a narrative format, rather than summarised as quantitative data in keeping with our overall aims. Our literature search criteria were kept relatively broad, but only studies from subSaharan Africa were considered to capture experiences from resource-limited settings similar to the future task-shifting project environment in Kenya. PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for terms: `task shifting’; `task sharing’; `task delegation’; `task substitution’ or `delegation of work’ in all countries of sub-Saharan Africa, with additional parameters set.
