Drying air , MAPE =k7.4 RH, v). R2 = 0.989, RMSE = six.202 0-4 circumstances = f (T, k = two.80 10-3 e0.059 T RH -0.139 v0.The inclusion of Equation (25) R2 = 0.989, RMSE = six.202 a generalized7.four in Equation (six) yielded 10-4 , MAPE = model able to (25) two describe with higher accuracy the temporal behavior of moisture ratiogeneralized0.997, capable The inclusion of Equation (25) in Equation (six) yielded a X (R = model RMSE = 1.285 10-2,to describe with high accuracy the temporal behaviordrying constant k (R2 = 0.997, MAPE = six.five ). The resulting course on the of moisture ratio X as a RMSE T, relative humidity RH, The airflow velocity v is displayed function of temperature = 1.285 10-2 , MAPE = six.5 ). and resulting course from the drying continual k as a six. graphically in Figure function of temperature T, relative humidity RH, and airflow velocity v is displayedgraphically in Figure six.Figure six. Drying continuous k as impacted by (a) the drying air temperature T, (b) relative humidity RH, and (c) airflow velocity Figure 6. Drying continuous k as impacted by (a) the drying air temperature T, (b) relative humidity RH, v. Strong lines represent Page model fitting, dashed lines show extrapolation beyond the dataset employed for fitting. (d) Predicted and (c) airflow velocity v. Strong lines represent Page model fitting, dashed lines show extrapolation values of drying continuous kpred vs. observed kobs .beyond the dataset employed for fitting. (d) Predicted values of drying continual kpred vs. observed kobs.3.5. Helpful Moisture Diffusion3.five. Successful Moisture Diffusionoutlays the values of productive diffusion coefficient D too as the coefficient TableTable three outlays of determination, root suggests square error, and imply absolute percentage error acquired the values of powerful diffusion coefficient D also as the coefficientof determination, root suggests square error,1and meanto predict closely the experimental data at a high the quick time equation for X 0.2 absolute percentage error acquired from person fittings at each2 drying condition. The 10-2 and MAPE ten.eight . In the inspection accuracy of R 0.941, RMSE five.595 statistics confirmed the capability of Table 3, 1 X of 0.two to predict the enhance of T, v and decrease of RH. The values of your short time equation forvalues D increased withclosely the experimental data at a high – of D varied five.595 10-2 12 to MAPE -11 for T From to 50 C, 7.843 10-11 to two 0.941, RMSE from 2.474 10 and 3.921 ten 10.eight . from 10the inspection of accuracy of R -12 for RH from 20 to 60 and 8.963 10-12 to 1.063 10-11 for v from 0.15 9.822 ten Table three, values of D to 1.00 ms-1with the improve of T, v and reduce of RH. The values of RH elevated . This could be ascribed for the larger power of molecules at higher T, low D varied from two.474 10-12 to 3.921 10-11 for T from ten to 50 , 7.843 10-11 to 9.822 10-from Benzamide Formula individual fittings at each and every drying condition. The statistics confirmed the capability ofAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,14 ofand higher v, which in turn increases the mobility of molecules, resulting within a more rapidly price of moisture transfer via diffusion. The derived values of productive diffusion coefficient D are within the (-)-Cedrene medchemexpress similar variety with all the findings of Gast , Abalone and Giner [29] and Giner and Mascheroni [30] particularly at T 30 C. Additionally, the observed values have been slightly lower compared to the values reported by Rafiee, Keyhani and Jafari [33] in the similar selection of drying temperatures which could be attributed to variations in wheat.
