Benefits of resultscalculations are plotted in Figure 8b. A close agreement in between the experimental DMPO Chemical results and this averaged result was discovered, which A close agreement amongst the experimental benefits and this averaged result was found, supports the soundness from the model. which supports the soundness with the model.three.2.3. Electron FAUC 365 References temperature three.2.3. Electron Temperature In plasma dominated by electron interactions, its chemistry is determined by the kinetic In plasma dominated by electron interactions, its chemistry depends upon the kinetic energyof these particles. The electrons take the power from the electric field and share energy of these particles. The electrons take the energy in the electric field and share their power with other particles by collisions. The electron temperature a a measure of their power with other particles by collisions. The electron temperature is is measure in the kinetic power of of electrons. the kinetic power thethe electrons. Figure 12 plots the dependence of your electron temperature on the positions for times Figure 12 plots the dependence of your electron temperature on the positions for instances two, 6, ten, 14, and 18 ms. The highest values of your electron temperature corresponded to 2, six, ten, 14, and 18 ms. The highest values from the electron temperature corresponded to positions where this field was highest, i.e., the powered electrode for constructive voltage and positions where this field was highest, i.e., the powered electrode for optimistic voltage along with the ground electrode for negative voltage. Otherwise, the electron temperature in the the ground electrode for damaging voltage. Otherwise, the electron temperature in the inlet/outlet pipes was reduce by the low electric field in these zones. inlet/outlet pipes was lower by the low electric field in these zones. The model final results of electron temperature have also been averaged more than the period (T = 20 ms). The averaged values for r = 15 mm are compared using the experimental measures of rotational, vibrational, and excitation temperatures in Figure 7b. The values of your theoretical electron temperatures were larger than these temperatures, which is typical of a 2-temperature plasma, characterized by the following relation among the temperatures: Te Texc Tv Tr Tg [47].Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10047 PEER Evaluation Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR18 of 25 18 of(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)Figure 12. Spatial distribution in the electron temperature for occasions two two ms, 6 6 ms, 10 ten (d) 14 14 and (e) (e) 18 ms Figure 12. Spatial distribution of the electron temperature for instances (a)(a)ms, (b)(b)ms, (c) (c) ms,ms, (d) ms,ms, and 18 ms for for the reactor at 22 kV AC voltage 1 cm cm distance among electrodes. the reactor at 22 kV AC voltage and and 1distance among electrodes.3.2.four.The two Splitting CO model final results of electron temperature have also been averaged over the period (T = Thems). The averaged values for r and temperature indicate that the chemistry in 20 high values of electron density = 15 mm are compared with the experimental measures of rotational, dominated by excitation temperatures with CO 7b. The values the AC-PPP reactor wasvibrational, andthe collisions of electronsin Figure 2 ground state from the theoretical electron temperatures have been higher mechanisms of CO splitting were: molecules. As predicted by the model, essentially the most relevantthan these temperatures, which is two typical of a 2-temperature plasma, characterized by the following relation between the -temperatures: diss.
