Nts. Table five. Situations of laboratory experiments. Parameters SymbolUnitValueParameters Frequency of fixed
Nts. Table 5. Circumstances of laboratory experiments. Parameters SymbolUnitValueParameters Frequency of fixed finish of cantilever beam Frequency of fixed end ofof cantilever beam Amplitude of fixed end cantilever beamSymbol ffe Afeffe Rl = sUnit Hz Hz mm mm k kValue 16.three 16.3 0.two 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 0.two 65, 70, 80AmplitudeValues of resistance of fixed end of cantilever beam Rl =Afe s Values of resistance four.two. Energy-Harvesting Process10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 65, 70, 80Experiments contained -Irofulven manufacturer existing measurements for 10 values of resistance. The course four.2. Energy-Harvesting Course of action of the Inositol nicotinate Epigenetics Measured current is presented in Figure 7a. On the basis from the values of present Experiments contained existing measurements for 10 values of resistance. The course (ig ) and resistance (Rl = s ), harvested power (Figure 7b) was determined by the use of the with the measured present is presented in Figure 7a. On the basis from the values of existing (ig) identified formula: and resistance (Rl = s), harvested power (Figure l7b) two was determined by the use of the identified Pg = R =s i g (12) formula: The measured values of energy, generated by the MFC patches, (Figure 7b) have been decrease two than the simulated values on the energy (FigureRl = s iThe supposed bring about was an interaction Pg = 6). g (12) with the adhesive layers amongst the steel substrate and the MFC patches. The adhesive layers restricted a strain transmission amongst the substrate layer and the piezoelectric material.(a)(b)Figure 7. Energy-harvesting approach: (a) Average current generated by MFC patches; (b) Energy generated by MFC patches. Figure 7. Energy-harvesting approach: (a) Average existing generated by MFC patches; (b) Energy generated by MFC patches.The measured values of power, generated by the MFC patches, (Figure 7b) were decrease than the simulated values of your energy (Figure six). The supposed cause was an interaction in the adhesive layers among the steel substrate and the MFC patches. The adhesive layers restricted a stress transmission among the substrate layer plus the piezoelectric material. 4.three. Vibration-Damping ProcessEnergies 2021, 14,11 of4.three. Vibration-Damping Approach Vibrations of 10 points in the beam structure had been measured by the use of the vision approach. An arrangement in the measured points is presented in Figure 4. Motion determination on the complete beam structure was carried out in 3 stages. Within the very first stage, the courses of displacement of nine chosen points in the beam structure have been measured 16 Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER Evaluation 11 of for Energies 2021, 14, x FOR PEER Assessment values of resistance. The displacement of exemplary point No. 10 for resistance equal to 11 of 16 10 65 k is presented in Figure eight.Figure eight. eight. Measured displacement of point No. 10 for resistance equal to 65 k. Measured displacement of point No. 10 for resistance equal to 65 k. Figure 8. Measured displacement of point No. 10 for resistance equal to 65 k. FigureInIn the secondstage, absolute values from the displacement of nine points have been calculated the second with the displacement of nine points have been calcuIn the secondstage, absolute values on the displacement of nine points were calcustage, absolute lated ten values of resistance. Comparison of of the absolute values of the displacements for for 10 values of resistance. Comparison the absolute values of the displacements of lated for ten values of resistance. Comparison of the absolute values on the displacements ofexemplary point No. 10 for 10 values of the shunt res.
