Ficity and sensitivityWe next examined the cross-reactivity between proBNP and BNP. As shown in Table 5, the presence of BNP did not affect the values measured with the proBNP assay system. Moreover, the values measured with the total BNP assay system were the sum of the BNP and proBNP even at different compositions of these two peptides. Thus, the total 25033180 BNP assay recognized both BNP and proBNP with the same efficiency and sensitivity. Likewise, the proBNP and total BNP assay systems recognized proBNP with the same efficiency and sensitivity.proBNP in Human PlasmaFigure 5. The relationships between total BNP (A), proBNP (B), and NT-proBNP (C) and age. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053233.gratios are higher in heart failure patients with ventricular overload than those with atrial overload [6]. Although this protocol provides useful information, the methodology is time-consuming and impractical for routine assays in clinical laboratories. In addition, recovery of proBNP may be diminished by both extraction and the gel filtration steps [9,16]. To overcome these problems, we developed new direct immunochemiluminescent assays for proBNP and total BNP. We used two monoclonal antibodies, BC203 and 18H5, to assay proBNP. BC203 recognizes an epitope in the C-terminal of proBNP, while 18H5 recognizes an epitope in the N-terminal. Recent studies showed that proBNP has seven sites suitable for Olinked oligosaccharide attachment (Ser36, Thr37, Thr44, Thr48, Thr53, Ser58 and Thr71) within the N-terminal portion of the peptide [14]. Because the O-linked oligosaccharide attachments almost completely inhibit the binding of the antibody to the peptide [17], we selected 18H5, which recognizes the N-terminal of proBNP (a.a. 13?0) in a region not subject to glycosylation (Figure 1). To assay total BNP, we used the monoclonal antibodies BC203 and KY-BNP-II, as previously reported [10]. In both assays, BC203 served as the capture antibody. Importantly, because the affinity of 18H5 for the N-terminal portion is similar to the affinity of KY-BNP-II for the ring structure, we are able to calculate the proBNP/total BNP ratio. In addition, our new assaysare less time-consuming and more sensitive and accurate than earlier ones, and the lower Methyl linolenate chemical information detection limits for total BNP (0.02 pmol/L) and proBNP (0.04 pmol/L) enabled us to measure plasma proBNP levels in nearly all the healthy subjects tested. We used gel-filtration on two tandemly connected Superdex 75 columns to determine the molecular mass of plasma proBNP. As shown in Figure 3-A,B, a single peak of proBNP was obtained in both the total BNP and proBNP assay systems. The elution points are consistent with that of 86168-78-7 manufacturer glycosylated proBNP, but not deglycosylated proBNP, and deglycosylation treatment significantly shifted the peak rightward (Figure 3-A,B) to an elution point consistent with proBNP. The peak immunoreactivity of proBNP after deglycosylation was slightly smaller than before treatment, suggesting the recovery rate of proBNP after gel-filtration is lower than that of glycosylated proBNP, which is consistent with proBNP being more adsorptive than glycosylated proBNP. Our findings are also consistent with 
previous Western blot analyses showing that plasma levels of glycosylated proBNP are elevated and no substantial level of proBNP is detected in severe heart failure [7]. Taken together, these results suggest that the major molecular form of proBNP in the plasma of patients with heart failure is the glycosylated.Ficity and sensitivityWe next examined the cross-reactivity between proBNP and BNP. As shown in Table 5, the presence of BNP did not affect the values measured with the proBNP assay system. Moreover, the values measured with the total BNP assay system were the sum of the BNP and proBNP even at different compositions of these two peptides. Thus, the total 25033180 BNP assay recognized both BNP and proBNP with the same efficiency and sensitivity. Likewise, the proBNP and total BNP assay systems recognized proBNP with the same efficiency and sensitivity.proBNP in Human PlasmaFigure 5. The relationships between total BNP (A), proBNP (B), and NT-proBNP (C) and age. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053233.gratios are higher in heart failure patients with ventricular overload than those with atrial overload [6]. Although this protocol provides useful information, the methodology is time-consuming and impractical for routine assays in clinical laboratories. In addition, recovery of proBNP may be diminished by both extraction and the gel filtration steps [9,16]. To overcome these problems, we developed new direct immunochemiluminescent assays for proBNP and total BNP. We used two monoclonal antibodies, BC203 and 18H5, to assay proBNP. BC203 recognizes an epitope in the C-terminal of proBNP, while 18H5 recognizes an epitope in the N-terminal. Recent studies showed that proBNP has seven sites suitable for Olinked oligosaccharide attachment (Ser36, Thr37, Thr44, Thr48, Thr53, Ser58 and Thr71) within the N-terminal portion of the peptide [14]. Because the O-linked oligosaccharide attachments almost completely inhibit the binding of the antibody to the peptide [17], we selected 18H5, which recognizes the N-terminal of proBNP (a.a. 13?0) in a region not subject to glycosylation (Figure 1). To assay total BNP, we used the monoclonal antibodies BC203 and KY-BNP-II, as previously reported [10]. In both assays, BC203 served as the capture antibody. Importantly, because the affinity of 18H5 for the N-terminal portion is similar to the affinity of KY-BNP-II for the ring structure, we are able to calculate the proBNP/total BNP ratio. In addition, our new assaysare less time-consuming and more sensitive and accurate than earlier ones, and the lower detection limits for total BNP (0.02 pmol/L) and proBNP (0.04 pmol/L) enabled us to measure plasma proBNP levels in nearly all the healthy subjects tested. We used gel-filtration on two tandemly connected Superdex 75 columns to determine the molecular mass of plasma proBNP. As shown in Figure 3-A,B, a single peak of proBNP was obtained in both the total BNP and proBNP assay systems. The elution points are consistent with that of glycosylated proBNP, but not deglycosylated proBNP, 
and deglycosylation treatment significantly shifted the peak rightward (Figure 3-A,B) to an elution point consistent with proBNP. The peak immunoreactivity of proBNP after deglycosylation was slightly smaller than before treatment, suggesting the recovery rate of proBNP after gel-filtration is lower than that of glycosylated proBNP, which is consistent with proBNP being more adsorptive than glycosylated proBNP. Our findings are also consistent with previous Western blot analyses showing that plasma levels of glycosylated proBNP are elevated and no substantial level of proBNP is detected in severe heart failure [7]. Taken together, these results suggest that the major molecular form of proBNP in the plasma of patients with heart failure is the glycosylated.